habitica/public/js/static.js

"use strict";

window.habitrpgStatic = angular.module('habitrpgStatic', ['notificationServices', 'userServices', 'chieffancypants.loadingBar', 'authCtrl'])
  .constant("API_URL", "")
  .constant("STORAGE_USER_ID", 'habitrpg-user')
  .constant("STORAGE_SETTINGS_ID", 'habit-mobile-settings')
  .constant("MOBILE_APP", false)
rewrite: push login modal to the front page, don't allow anonymous usage. 2013-09-02 05:08:28 +00:00			`"use strict";`

Change static module name to habitrpgStatic. The way the tests are written now, the habitrpg module definition in static.js was clobbering the one in app.js. In other words, most of the tests weren't testing what they thought they were testing. 2014-01-12 23:00:47 +00:00			`window.habitrpgStatic = angular.module('habitrpgStatic', ['notificationServices', 'userServices', 'chieffancypants.loadingBar', 'authCtrl'])`
rewrite: push login modal to the front page, don't allow anonymous usage. 2013-09-02 05:08:28 +00:00			`.constant("API_URL", "")`
			`.constant("STORAGE_USER_ID", 'habitrpg-user')`
MOBILE_APP on static, deep-watch user.items.gear.equipped 2013-12-16 06:17:09 +00:00			`.constant("STORAGE_SETTINGS_ID", 'habit-mobile-settings')`
Change static module name to habitrpgStatic. The way the tests are written now, the habitrpg module definition in static.js was clobbering the one in app.js. In other words, most of the tests weren't testing what they thought they were testing. 2014-01-12 23:00:47 +00:00			`.constant("MOBILE_APP", false)`